Blog

What Are “Time Is of the Essence” Clauses and How They Impact Real Estate Closings in NY

In New York real estate transactions, deadlines matter—but not all deadlines carry the same legal weight. One phrase in particular can dramatically change the outcome of a delayed closing: “time is of the essence.”

Buyers and sellers often see this language in contracts or pre-closing notices without fully understanding its consequences. In practice, a time is of the essence clause can determine whether a deal survives a missed deadline or collapses entirely.

What Does “Time Is of the Essence” Mean in Real Estate?

A time is of the essence clause makes a contractual deadline legally strict. When this language applies, failure to perform by the specified date is considered a material breach of the contract, not a minor delay.

Without this clause, New York courts often treat closing dates as flexible, allowing reasonable delays if the parties are acting in good faith. Once time is of the essence is invoked, that flexibility disappears.

Where Time Is of the Essence Appears in NY Transactions

In New York, time is of the essence may appear in two main ways:

  • In the original contract – Some contracts include this language from the outset, making deadlines strict from day one.
  • By written notice before closing – More commonly, one party serves a formal notice making time of the essence after delays or concerns arise.

A proper notice must clearly state:

  • That time is now of the essence
  • A specific closing date
  • That failure to close on that date will result in default

Courts closely scrutinize these notices, and mistakes in wording or timing can invalidate them.

How It Impacts Buyers

For buyers, a time is of the essence deadline can be risky if financing, inspections, or title issues are not fully resolved.

If a buyer fails to close on a valid time of the essence date, they may:

  • Lose their deposit
  • Be declared in default
  • Lose the right to enforce the contract

This is especially important in competitive Long Island markets, where delays are common but tolerance can disappear quickly once this clause is invoked.

How It Impacts Sellers

For sellers, time is of the essence can be a powerful tool—but also a potential liability.

If a seller invokes the clause improperly or is not ready, willing, and able to close on the stated date, the seller may:

  • Be found in breach themselves
  • Lose the right to cancel the contract
  • Face legal claims from the buyer

A seller cannot use time is of the essence to pressure a buyer while failing to meet their own obligations.

Common Situations Where Disputes Arise

Time is of the essence disputes often arise when:

  • Financing approval is delayed
  • Title defects surface late in the process
  • One party is using delays strategically
  • Market conditions change and one side wants out

In these situations, whether the clause was properly invoked—and whether the parties complied—can determine who keeps or forfeits significant sums of money.

Is Time Is of the Essence Automatic in NY?

No. Time is not automatically of the essence in New York real estate contracts.
Unless the contract explicitly states it, courts usually treat closing dates as target dates, not drop-dead deadlines.

That distinction is critical. Many buyers and sellers mistakenly assume that missing a closing date automatically voids the deal. In reality, the legal consequences depend on whether time was formally made of the essence.

Why Legal Guidance Matters

Because time is of the essence clauses carry serious legal consequences, they should never be taken lightly. Whether you are considering invoking one—or responding to one—legal review is essential.

An experienced real estate attorney can:

  • Evaluate whether the clause or notice is legally valid
  • Advise on risks before a closing deadline
  • Protect deposits and contractual rights
  • Help resolve disputes before they escalate into litigation

Time is of the essence clauses can protect parties from endless delays, but they can also abruptly end a transaction if mishandled. In New York real estate closings, understanding when deadlines are flexible—and when they are absolute—can make the difference between closing successfully and facing costly legal consequences.

Chiariello & Chiariello advises buyers and sellers throughout Long Island on complex real estate disputes and contract enforcement issues. If questions arise about deadlines, closing delays, or contract enforcement, contact us today!

Recommended Posts

Common Title Issues That May Arise Before a Real Estate Closing

After a real estate contract is signed, the purchaser’s attorney will usually order a title search. The purpose of the search is to confirm that the seller owns the property and can transfer clear and marketable title at closing. Even when a transaction appears straightforward, the title report may reveal issues that must be addressed before the closing can take place. One common issue is an open mortgage or lien. A prior mortgage may have been paid in full but never formally discharged of record. The title search may also reveal judgment liens, tax liens, unpaid property taxes, or other claims against the seller or the property. These items generally must be paid, released, or otherwise resolved at or before closing. The search may also uncover ownership or deed problems. A prior deed may contain an incorrect legal description, a misspelled name, a missing signature, or an improper acknowledgment. There may also be questions involving a deceased owner, an estate, a trust, a former spouse, or another person who may still have an ownership interest in the property. Survey and boundary issues can also delay a closing. Improvements such as fences, sheds, driveways, garages, decks, or swimming pools may encroach onto neighboring property or violate setback requirements. A neighbor’s structure may also encroach onto the property being purchased. Another frequent concern involves open building permits, certificates of occupancy, and municipal violations. An addition, finished basement, converted garage, deck, or other improvement may have been constructed without required permits or approvals. Depending upon the contract and the nature of the issue, the seller may be required to obtain approvals, cure violations, or provide an acceptable closing credit or escrow. The title report may also disclose easements, restrictions, and rights of way affecting the property. Some are routine, such as utility easements, while others may limit how the property can be used or developed. Purchasers should carefully review any restrictions that could interfere with their intended use of the property. Bankruptcy filings, pending lawsuits, unpaid homeowner association charges, and errors in public records may also create title concerns. In some cases, the issue can be resolved quickly through additional documentation. In others, the closing may need to be delayed while corrective documents, releases, court orders, or municipal approvals are obtained. Most title issues are curable, but identifying them early is important. Prompt review of the title report allows the attorneys, title company, lender, seller, and purchaser to address potential problems before the scheduled closing date and reduce the risk of an unexpected delay.

Fences and Adverse Possession in New York: Why the Property Line Still Matters

Few neighbor disputes become heated faster than a fence that is not exactly on the property line. In New York, a misplaced fence can raise concerns about adverse possession—the legal doctrine that, in limited circumstances, allows someone to acquire title to land they do not technically own. Under New York law, adverse possession generally requires possession that is actual, open and notorious, exclusive, continuous, adverse, and under a claim of right for the statutory period. New York’s statute defines “claim of right” as a reasonable basis for believing the property belongs to the possessor. Fences matter because they can be evidence that someone is treating land as their own. New York’s RPAPL § 522 provides that land may be considered possessed where there are acts sufficiently open to put a reasonably diligent owner on notice, or where the land has been protected by a “substantial enclosure.” In plain English, a real fence enclosing a disputed strip may be more legally significant than casual use. But not every fence creates an adverse possession claim. Since New York’s 2008 amendments, RPAPL § 543 states that de minimis, non-structural encroachments, including fences, hedges, plantings, sheds, and non-structural walls, are deemed permissive and non-adverse. The same statute says lawn mowing or similar maintenance across a boundary line is also permissive and non-adverse. That means a small fence mistake, routine yard maintenance, or minor landscaping over the line will not automatically give a neighbor ownership rights. The facts still matter: the size and permanence of the encroachment, whether the disputed area was truly enclosed, how long the condition existed, whether use was exclusive, and whether the possessor had a reasonable basis for believing the land was theirs. For homeowners, the lesson is simple: do not rely on assumptions. Before installing or replacing a fence, get a current survey. If an existing fence appears off-line, address it promptly and in writing. Boundary problems are usually easier to solve early—before years of use, investment, and neighbor expectations turn a small fence issue into a title dispute. This post is for general information only and is not legal advice. For details about your particular situation, feel free to call Chiariello & Chiariello - 516-801-8100

America at 250

As Independence Day approaches, we find ourselves reflecting with gratitude on the remarkable inheritance we share as Americans. The liberty we enjoy today was not inevitable. It was secured by the courage of those who pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to the idea that people are endowed with unalienable rights - and it has been preserved across generations by countless men and women who believed those freedoms were worth defending. The framework of law and ordered liberty they built is the same foundation that allows our work, our community, and our families to flourish. We are deeply thankful for that legacy, and for the privilege of practicing law within a system devoted to justice and the rule of law. We are grateful, too, for the trust you place in our firm to help safeguard your own corner of it. This Independence Day, we hope you'll take a moment to honor those who came before us and to celebrate the freedom they passed into our keeping, perhaps even take a moment to read the Declaration (Declaration of Independence: A Transcription | National Archives). From our family to yours, we wish you a safe, joyful, and meaningful Fourth.